Interpreting Inception: A Film That Keeps You Talking

By John C.

 

Every film seen with an audience is a shared experience.  We laugh, we cry, we think with complete strangers.  When a film is seen with friends, than the opportunity is there for discussion afterwards.  I truly believe that it’s just as important to be able to tell people with a smile on your face that you enjoyed a film, as it is important for those that prompt discussion.  And no film this summer has prompted discussion quite like Christopher Nolan’s mind-blowing masterpiece, Inception.  It’s been two weeks now since I experienced the film, and I haven’t stopped thinking about it since.

 

You can read all of our spoiler-free thoughts on the movie here, and because this is such a hot topic expect to see more opinion pieces and articles in the future.  Today I’m strictly going to talk about a few of the different interpretations I’ve been hearing about the ending, as well as go into my own thoughts a little bit.  The moral premise and visual design are topics all their own.  So if you’ve yet to see the film, there are major spoilers after the break.

I think, if you pay close attention, it’s fairly easy to understand the plot line of Inception.  Cobb is performing an inception on Fischer, and there are many reasons to believe that it was successful.  Where the story gets complicated is in the subplot with Cobb’s deceased wife, Mal.  Cobb knew that inception was a process that worked because he planted the idea in Mal’s head that blurred her line between dreams and reality, which caused her to go insane and commit suicide.

 

I believe that she is dead in the real world, and only still exists in Cobb’s dream world.  But some people have said that if she keeps trying to convince Cobb to commit suicide in his dream, than is it possible that she is the one trying to give him the kick and send him back into reality?  I think that she is just a projection from Cobb’s own memory, born out of guilt, that is trying to convince him to stay in his dream.

 

Some have even wondered if Saito is the one performing inception on Cobb, trying to plant the seed of an idea to blur the line between his dream and his reality.  And that is what he means when he tells Cobb that if he performs the inception he has a way to get him back to the United States to spend his life with his kids.  Or is the whole thing just an experiment played out by Ariadne, or just a desperate attempt by Arthur to free him from his past?  I think going this far just complicates everything further, and you could get stuck in limbo just thinking about it.

 

Some have even suggested that the entire film is Cobb’s dream, and the totem will continue spinning until he naturally does or doesn’t wake up.  Other’s have suggested that everything up to those final few scenes took place within Cobb’s mind – kind of a Wizard of Oz ending.  But there is plenty here to convince me that this is not the case.  Cobb is seen wearing a wedding ring in his dream sequences, but not in the real world scenes, and the real people behave differently than the projections.  Besides, when you view Nolan’s other work, I honestly don’t believe he would have it all be a dream – it’s just too easy an answer.

 

People have told me that they think the fact that Cobb uses Mal’s totem – the iconic silver top – is a sign that everything was imagined.  But after Mal’s death, continuing to use her totem would gain dual significance for Cobb.  Not only would it allow him to ground himself back in reality, but it would also be a reminder of the dangers of messing with someone’s mind.  But perhaps using someone else’s totem, something that he warns the others against, is partially what’s driving him over the edge.

 

For me, as I watched the movie, the line between what scenes take place in the subconscious and which in the real world was pretty clear-cut.  The only scenes in question in my mind are the final few.  As Cobb walks through the airport, just waved through security with no hassles, and brought back to his house where he is greeted by his kids, who are seemingly the same age as they were in his dream, we aren’t really sure what to believe.  On one hand, everything is too perfect – this is the best possible ending.  As he walks off to go visit his kids, he spins his top, mainly out of habit.  If this is reality it will stop spinning.  But if this is a dream, it will go on forever.  As the top starts to teeter, but not fall, the screen cuts to black.

 

And that is what is so brilliant about the film: It keeps us glued to the screen for the entire 148-minute running-time, and gives us something to talk and think about for long after it’s over.  Through that final scene, Nolan has managed to successfully perform an inception – an idea planted so deep into our subconscious that it is impossible to forget.  And, long after we see the movie, the question remains, will the totem stop spinning?

5 thoughts on “Interpreting Inception: A Film That Keeps You Talking

  1. My feelings about the film are pretty similar to yours. I think a lot of the answers like in examining what kind of a film it is and what kind of a director made it. A lot of theories I’m seeing online, besides being thin, are so obtuse that they belong to a different type of film, like Mulholland Drive or 2001. As brilliant and thought provoking as Nolan’s films are I don’t see him as trying to make anything that enigmatic. His work is very linear in its own way.

    Having said all that, there is one scene that has given me a hard time and that is after Cobb wakes up at Yusuf’s place, after sampling Yusuf’s powerful dream compound. If I remember correctly when he’s in the bathroom splashing water in his face he has a brief flash of an open window, curtains blowing, black on the other side. This is the only instance I can think of in the supposed reality layer where we see any of his projection motifs poking through. It’s possible that this was done merely to underscore the notion that Cobb was beginning to suffer psychologically and, as Ariadne was warning, was going to put the team at greater risk. Still, the fact that Cobb spins the top and Saito startles him before we can see the results makes this scene problematic.

    Like

    1. I agree that Nolan’s work is linear to a certain degree, and with Inception it wasn’t necessarily a fractured narrative. I was actually surprised by how much I was able to follow the film on first viewing.

      I’ll have to watch closely for that scene you mentioned the next time I see the film.

      Thanks for reading and adding your thoughts,

      -John C.

      Like

  2. I really want to see this movie again to see what I have missed and pay attention to details like the one mentioned above. I agree that I was amazed that I could follow it as well as I did. It was just after getting out of the film that I started to question everything that I had seen and started to wonder whether the parts or even if the whole movie was a dream level for Cobb. I just wonder why we never see what Cobb’s totem is. Since it is said to be an important thing to have your own totem, why do we not see his? Anyways, I will be going to watch this movie again in the near future.

    Like

    1. I think that Cobb started using Mal’s totem as a reminder of what could happen. He was the one always making rules but never seemed to follow them himself, so maybe before Mal’s death he never even kept a totem. Maybe it was after the accident with Mal that he realized just how important it was for everyone to have something to ground them back in the real world.

      The fact that the top never stopped spinning in a dream may have been a discovery they made together, making them realize that this was a good way to distinguish between dreams and reality. Mal locked it away because she didn’t want to know if their perfect world was just in her subconscious. As well, as I wrote in the third paragraph from the end, the top had probably gained dual significance for Cobb.

      I also look forward to seeing the film again to further appreciate all the twists and turns.

      Thanks for commenting,

      -John C.

      Like

      1. My interpretation of the film is this…. Mal and Cobb are the only things that are real. For the entire movie Cobb is lost in his unconscious and Mal is attempting to bring him back to her. They are both trapped in the unconscious state and while Cobb believes Mal is dead and that he escaped, the truth is that they are there together. The last scene with Mal she tries to explain that to him and when he doesn’t listen his “projection” shoots Mal. The movie ends with Cobb continuing to be lost in his own mind. It’s only a happy ending because Cobb doesn’t know any better.

        Like

Leave a Reply